Safety Use Cases and Technical Insights

The landscape of AI and autonomous systems is evolving at a breakneck pace. A new wave of regulation is rising to meet it, and for many organizations, this represents a daunting new challenge. Nowhere is this clearer than in California, with the introduction of the “Transparency in Frontier Artificial Intelligence Act,” better known as SB 53. This landmark legislation signals a fundamental shift. Regulators are no longer just asking, “Is your product safe?” They are demanding, “Prove to us, and

In an era of rapid technological advancement, the pressure to bring innovative products to market is immense. For many companies, safety and regulatory compliance can feel like a roadblock—a necessary but complex hurdle that diverts valuable time and resources away from core development. The traditional approach often involves a full-scale engagement with safety consultants, a process that can be both costly and time-consuming. But what if there was a way to integrate a north-star compliance strategy into your process from

Functional safety development, as guided by standards like IEC 61508, ISO 13849 or ISO 26262, relies on a structured lifecycle approach to ensure that safety is designed into a system from its inception.  Functional safety certification does not happen on accident. It requires a deliberate and structured approach, which is precisely what the functional safety lifecycle provides. Adhering to these defined phases is crucial because it ensures a systematic and comprehensive consideration of all safety aspects.  The lifecycle phases act